Watch and Track

Are the branches of our government working as designed, or straining under pressure? And if it’s the latter, what actually brings a system back into balance?

Each entry is assessed against the text of the Constitution, the articles and amendments…not against how it was reported. The sources listed show how the same event was told across the spectrum (I aim for 4), so you can read them and come back to the plain account. If something is wrong, misrepresented, or missing, tell me. The form’s at the bottom of the page.

16Overreach / violation
Exceeds authority or defies a court order.
307Strained / contested
Legally disputed or litigation ongoing.
233Functioning as designed
A branch restrains another, and it holds.
556 entries tracked · Last updated September 30, 2026
□ Executive branch
President Trump · DHS · DOJ · Pentagon
Overreach indicators · Active but strained
● Executive Order Directs Interagency Coordination on H-1B Visa Program Administration ▸
● Proclamation Restricting Entry of Certain Nonimmigrant Workers Signed and Published ▸
● Proclamation Modifies Scope of Additional Duties on Canadian Products Tied to Alcoholic Beverage Trade ▸
● Proclamation Excludes Certain Canadian Products From Importation Over Alcoholic Beverage Trade Practices ▸
● Proclamation Excludes Certain Canadian Products From Importation Over Dairy Trade Practices ▸
□ Legislative branch
House · Senate · Republican majority
Abdication indicators · Active but strained
● Senate Bill on Fairness and Accountability in Noncitizen Arrest and Detention Referred to Judiciary Committee ▸
● Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act Referred to House Judiciary Committee ▸
● House Bill to Bar Federal Biometric Surveillance Without Statutory Authorization Referred to Committees ▸
● House Bill to Prohibit Government Use of Automated License Plate Readers Referred to Committees ▸
● Senate Bill to Bar Federal Biometric Surveillance Without Statutory Authorization Referred to Judiciary Committee ▸
□ Judicial branch
SCOTUS · Federal district courts · Circuit courts
Functioning as check · Low strain
● Sixth Circuit Issues Decision in KalshiEX LLC v. Schuler ▸
● Sixth Circuit Issues Decision in KalshiEX LLC v. Orgel ▸
● Sixth Circuit Issues Decision in Welty v. Dunaway ▸
● Third Circuit Issues Decision in Hartmann v. Chudzik ▸
● Fourth Circuit Issues Decision in Andrews v. Baltimore City Police Department ▸

Click your state to see your governor, chief justice, how your legislature splits, how your state assigns its electoral votes, and links to your state constitution and your current congressional map.

State-level tracking is being built out. Right now every state has the basics; the full tracker is coming.

Click any state to explore

Northeast Midwest South West
US Territories
American Samoa
Governor: Pulaalii Nikolao Pula (R)
Delegate: Aumua Amata Radewagen (R)
Non-voting Delegate
Guam
Governor: Lou Leon Guerrero (D)
Delegate: James Moylan (R)
Non-voting Delegate
Northern Mariana Islands
Governor: David M. Apatang (R)
Delegate: Kimberlyn King-Hinds (R)
Non-voting Delegate
Puerto Rico
Governor: Jenniffer Gonzalez-Colon (R)
Delegate: Pablo Hernandez (D)
Resident Commissioner (votes in committee, not on House floor)
U.S. Virgin Islands
Governor: Albert Bryan (D)
Delegate: Stacey Plaskett (D)
Non-voting Delegate
* Map boundaries via U.S. Census Bureau, rendered with D3.js and TopoJSON (us-atlas). Regions per U.S. Census Bureau classification.

Watch

When we see Green, it means the action is clearly allowed by the Constitution or our laws as they are written. Think of this as the routine, familiar powers that have been used time and again, just as expected.

Amber, means the action pushes at the edge of established authority, something new, something bold, or something a court has paused without deciding. Green and red test against text… amber tests against practice and asks, “Does this go further than what’s normally done?” That makes this the most subjective out of all three, and I’d rather say that out loud than pretend it simply isn’t.

We’re back to certainty when something is Red, as it signals a clear overstep. This comes up when a court has found an action likely/or clearly goes beyond what the law allows, or when it directly clashes with the Constitution.


The methodology, the constitutional tests, and the severity criteria are mine. I’m not a developer (but if you know one, let me know); I used AI to build the database, write the code, draft candidate summaries from source records, and teach me enough SQL to review and edit every entry before promoting them to the live tracker.

Every entry starts with a named, sourced government record (a bill, a court filing, an executive order). The goal is to read where power actually stands using consistent parameters, not to hand down a verdict.

This is a growing project. Coverage will expand, and the process may change as I continue untying the knots.

Name

Scroll to Top